ALSO POSSIBLE: Have you heard this term before?

ALSO POSSIBLE: Have you heard of flash-panning previously?

Recently, i’I discovered this when I was bored, and i stopped to read about this andto found out more.

SIt seems like a meeting with two people, o. Of course, it seems romantic, but. However, both don’t want someanything serious, so, in the beginning of atheir relationship, twhe firstn troubles that appear, if something not easy to solve, they just give up.

Is literally like the relationships currentMany current relations seems like this.

And particularly, ItThis is more common inamong younger people than in older folks.

Have you heard of this before?

For "heard ___" the blank would be what/who you heard from
Usually "heard of ____" involves the topic

Recently, i’I discovered this whilen I was bored, and iI stopped to read this and fouind out more.

Since "read" and "find" are with to "stopped" which is already in past tense, you don't need them to be in past tense as well

SIt seems likethat a meet withing between two people, of course, seemswould be romantic, but both don’tneither want something serious, so, in the beginning of atheir relationship, after the first troubles that appear, something easy to solve, they just give up.

Needs a subject so add "it" at the beginning
"Meet with ___" would be a verb, and "meeting between" is a noun (I believe that meeting between is for 2 people that aren't you and meeting with is when you're part of it, but I'm not entirely sure)
After seems you use the verb would
Replace "both dont'" with "neither"
"Their" sounds better than "a"

It's literally like the relationships currently.

Or "current relationships"

And particularly, Iit is more common in younger people.

I’am'm also younger too, and it is hard to me,for me to find a relationship with peoplsomeone who wants something serious and lasting.

"[adjective] for me" instead of "[adjective] to me"
"Someone" for one unknown person

Have you heard about this before?

Recently, i’I discovered this when I was bored, and iI stopped to read about this and found out more.

SIt seems to be like a meet withing between two people, o. Of course, seemit sounds romantic, but both don’tneither want something serious, s. So, in the beginning of a relationship, when the first troubles that appear, something easy to solve, they just give up.

Be careful with double negatives. It's better to say "neither want" than "both don't want".

Is literally like the relationships current.

And particularly, Iit is more common in younger people.

I’am younger too and it is hard to me,for me to find a relationship with people who want something serious and lasting.

Have you heard (about) this before?

It sounds very casual to omit the "about" - you normally wouldn't in writing, but people might when speaking.

Recently, i’I discovered this when I was bored, and iI stopped to read about this and found out more.

SIt seems like a meeting with two people, which of course, seems romantic, but both don’tneither want something serious, so, in the beginning of a relationship, when the first troubles that appear, even something easy to solve, they just give up.

It is literally like the relationships current(?).

Not quite sure what you meant by current here.

And particularly, Iit is more common inamong younger people.

I’am younger too and it is hard to me,for me to find a relationship with people who want something serious and lasting.

Again "younger" without a point of comparison is pretty casual/slangy. I think you have a pretty casual tone for this piece, so it fits, but formally it should just be "young"

Have you heard this before?ere is a new topic.

Recently, i’I've discovered thisat when I wasam bored, and iI stop to read this and fou, I find out more.

Seems like a meet with two people, of course, seems romantic, but both don’t want something serious, so, in the beginning of a relationship, the first troubles that appear, something easy to solve, they just give up.