When we trivialize something, we see ourselves in a position of superiority, where in which we have total control of the situation.

My other friend ended up talking like and having the reaction time of a zombie.

I understand that people want to evade fromavoid reality, but I don't share it.

"Avoid" is more natural sounding than "evade".

It's like not cleaning and hidsweeping everything under the rug, one day it will be unbearable.

In English, "sweeping under the rug" or "sweeping [whatever] under the rug" is the way to phrase the idiom.

The status quotrend of countries starting to promote or even allow it worries me.

I'd prefer to use "trend" because I'm assuming you mean it's a noticeable and ongoing pattern.

Basically one country legalizes/decriminalizes marijuana, then another follows, and other, and so forth. It's basically the same way people follow trends online and in life.

Sometimes people tend to trivialize it, but I think that is precisely what makes such drugs really dangerous is exactly that.

I've made a suggestion, but what you said can be understood as well.

When we trivialize something, we see ourselves in a position of superiority, where from which we have total control of the situation.

My other friend ended up talking and having thewith the speech and reaction time of a zombie.

It's very sad to see how, with time, the abuse of these substances led to my friends turning into total strangers.

I understand that people want to evade from reality, but I don't share ithat sentiment.

You could also say "escape from reality"

"Evade" is used on its own, while "escape" is followed by "from"

It's like not cleaning and hidsweeping everything under the rug, instead of cleaning it properly; one day it will be unbearable.

We already have a very docile and naïve population, these types of calming drugs will only make people dumber and less aware of their surroundings.

"these" should be followed by a word in its plural form

Marijuana is aherb that contains several psycho-active drugs.

Strictly speaking, some of the chemicals inside of marijuana are "drug", but the hemp plant is not a drug.

Sometimes people tend to trivialize it, but I think that [MEANING UNCLEAR: Specify *what* makes drugs really dangerous is exactly that.marijuana dangerous.]

When we trivialize something we see ourselves in a position of superiority, where weith have total control of the situation.

The same happens with alcohol, both of these drugs are highly addictive and dangerous, but they're quLOGIC: Different people react differently to alcohol and marijuana. I have one drink of alcohol a week, but haven't been drunk for over 15 years. Some of friends smoke marjijuana once or twice a year, but have no dependency on ite accepted by societnd use it responsibly.

I understand that some people want to evadscape from "reality", but I don't share itnot me.

The same happens with alcohol,; both of these drugs are highly addictive and dangerous, but they're quite accepted by society.

Separate sentences or semicolon.

My other friend ended up talking like and having the reaction time of a zombie.

It's very sad to see how, with time, the abuse of these substances led to my friends turning into total strangers.

I understand that people want to evadscape from reality, but I don't share ithat sentiment.

"evade" (without preposition) or "escape from"

Consuming drugs will only delay the problem while making it biggerworse.

It's like not cleaning and hiding everything under the rug, - one day it will be unbearable.

I think a colon or a hyphen would work better here.

The status quocurrent/growing number of countries starting to promote or evenit, let alone allow it, worries me.

I don't know if my suggestion is what you were going for, but "status quo" doesn't really make sense here imo.

We already have a very docile and naïve population, t. These types of calming drugs will only make people dumber and less aware of their surroundings.

"this type" or "these types"