La pPasta La Pasta

we typically capitalize all of the important words in a title

La pPasta La Pasta

..that’s how the Italian’s call my favorite food. ..that’s how the Italians call my favorite food.

..that’s howwhat the Italian’s call my favorite food. ..that’s what the Italian’s call my favorite food.

Ever since I was a child, I have loved to eat noodles. Ever since I was a child, I have loved to eat noodles.

In my opinion, every kind of noodle has a different taste,; it doesn’t matter, whether it’s spaghetti or fusilli. In my opinion, every kind of noodle has a different taste; it doesn’t matter whether it’s spaghetti or fusilli.

In my opinion, every kind of noodle has a different taste,. It doesn’t matter, whether it’s spaghetti or fusilli. In my opinion, every kind of noodle has a different taste. It doesn’t matter whether it’s spaghetti or fusilli.

It’s can be cooked quickly, can be and served in many ways, for example: with fish, meat, or vegetables and, plus it is accepted by every one. It can be cooked quickly and served in many ways, for example: with fish, meat, or vegetables, plus it is accepted by everyone.

Both "is cooked quickly" and "be served in..." are predicates sharing the same subject ("It"), which means you'd need a conjunction without the comma to connect the predicates together. Technically it's bad English to use a contraction "it's" when the second predicate doesn't use "is," but it's something that a lot people will do in casual conversation and informal writing anyway, so it's not a big deal. If you wanted it to be considered good English, you'd use the same helping verb for both predicates and then share both the subject and helping verbs between the connected predicates. Either "can" for both cooked and served, or is for both cooked and served. Both would be valid.

It’s cookeds quickly, and can be served in many ways, for example:such as with fish, meat or vegetables and . And what's more, it's a dish accepted by every one. It cooks quickly and can be served in many ways, such as with fish, meat or vegetables. And what's more, it's a dish accepted by every one.

You are trying to fit too much into one sentence. It would be best to separate it into at least two separate thoughts.

I have never met a person in my life that doesn’t like noodles. I have never met a person in my life that doesn’t like noodles.

I never met a person in my life thatwho doesn’t like noodles. I never met a person in my life who doesn’t like noodles.

Use "who" for people and "that" for things, therefore "a person who" is best for this sentence.

My favorite way to eat them is with fish, or sometimeshing simple with tomato sauce and Parmesan cheese. My favorite way to eat them is with fish, or something simple with tomato sauce and Parmesan cheese.

My favorite way to eat them is with fish, or sometimes simpley with tomato sauce and Parmesan cheese. My favorite way to eat them is with fish, or sometimes simply with tomato sauce and Parmesan cheese.

What I hear often andSomething I often hear from other people that I always laugh about is, people saying, that all noodles taste the same. Something I often hear from other people that I always laugh about is that all noodles taste the same.

What I hear often and I alwayshear and laugh about is, people saying, that all noodles taste the same. What I often hear and laugh about is people saying that all noodles taste the same.

The commas around "people saying" aren't needed. And although you may "hear often" and "always laugh", simplifying the first part sounds smoother.

Only the ones, who doesn’t understand the beauty of noodles willould say this. Only the ones who don’t understand the beauty of noodles would say this.

Only the ones,ose who doesn’t understand the beauty of noodles willould say this. Only those who doesn’t understand the beauty of noodles would say this.

English speakers typically use a conditional verb tense in this situation. What someone WOULD do, opposed to WILL do.