Unfreedom

I assume this is intentionally making up a word, as unfreedom isn't a real English word

Warning: therse are pessimistic thoughts.

We are all under the delusion that we have a choices.

More natural to talk about choices plural since you're not just talking about one decision.

Moreover, we didn't compare variantoptions to decide where, when, and in which family to appear.

Were you born to spend your young yearsth in the middle of a war/a or crisis?

Seperating things with a "/" sounds kind of abbreviated, like something you might do while taking notes. If you're writing a formal-ish persuasive argument, as this piece reads, then it's better to use or.

The second argument is about our bodies.

Mood also depends on health.

If it'this argument is not enough, I could remind you that our senses are also rooted in aour body'sies' capabilities.

"it" is a little too ambiguous here.

For example, cats see the world in another wadifferently.

Just changing to a more natural choice of words.

We can choose which job is acceptable or even wanteddesirable for us.

Although homeless people often don't have a job, people do not tend to join them, so it's not an option.

"homeless" is an adjective, not a noun. In casual speech it's sometimes used as a noun, but since this is a formal argument it's not appropriate. "homeless" as a noun can also be seen as offensive.

People should do anything to avoid this feeling.

This is sort of an instruction or command as written, not sure that's your intention.

Governments are also about unfreedomlimits because they are based on force.

It's more unnatural to use made up words in the body of an argument than in a title.

The last argument is about the fact that, as we don’t have an option to be born or not to be born, we also don't have an option to die or not to die.

Certainly, we can take some precautions, but nobody knows why how they will die.

Nobody knows their day of death.

Chaos is a fundament ofal in the world.

fundament as a noun is archaic - fundamental is used much much more often, usually as an adjective (but it still gets used as a noun more often than fundament)

You should protect your life, ithat's an instinct, but why?

It's funny that so many people have asked these questions and most of them have concluded that freedom is appreciating life itself.

I really think that since so many philosophies madearrived at a similar conclusion (although they had differences in important things), this consensus also confirms unfreedom.

It would be ridiculous if thereat was my conclusion.

Honestly, I don't even have this.

"this" is unclear.