Tammy's avatar
Tammy

Aug. 29, 2025

0
The methods by which Chinese characters were created (2)

You can read the first installment here: https://langcorrect.com/journals/the-methods-of-creating-chinese-characters-1/

The second formation of Chinese Characters is ideographic or self-explanatory.

This one has two perfect examples: 上 (up) and 下 (down). You can imagine a water level, something uper than the level is 上, and the things lower than the level are 下.

There are three more examples, which are the easiest characters: 一(one), 二(two), 三(three). I don't even need to explain them, right?

Compared to those pictographic characters, I think ideographic characters are more abstract. They are not natural objects, but some conceptions from our ancestors' minds.


您可以阅读第一部分的内容:https://langcorrect.com/journals/the-methods-of-creating-chinese-characters-1/

汉字的第二种造字方式是指事,即具有自明性。

这里有两个非常典型的例子:上(up)和下(down)。你可以想象一个水平面,高于水位的物体就是“上”,而低于水位的物体就是“下”。

还有另外三个例子,它们是最简单的汉字:一(one)、二(two)、三(three)。我甚至都不需要去解释它们,对吧?

与那些象形文字相比,我认为指事法造出的文字更为抽象。它们并非自然界存在的物体,而是我们祖先头脑中的一些概念。

Corrections

The methods by which Chinese characters were created (2)

You can read the first installment here: https://langcorrect.com/journals/the-methods-of-creating-chinese-characters-1/


The second
formation ofway Chinese Ccharacters were formed is ideographic or self-explanatory.

You can imagine a water level, and something uphigher than the level is 上, and the things lower than the level are 下.

There are three more examples, which are the easiest characters: 一 (one), 二 (two), 三 (three).

Insert a space before each of the left parentheses marks.

I don't even need to explain them, right?

Compared to those pictographic characters I described in my previous post, I think ideographic characters are more abstract.

They are not natural objects, but some conceptions from our ancestors' minds.

suggestion: They represent not natural objects, but abstract concepts in our ancestors’ minds.

Feedback

Nicely done.

Tammy's avatar
Tammy

Aug. 31, 2025

0

谢谢!

Have a nice weekend!

The methods by which Chinese characters were created (2)

You can read the first installment (or entry) here: https://langcorrect.com/journals/the-methods-of-creating-chinese-characters-1/


The second formation of Chinese Characters is ideographic or self-explanatory.

or
"The second method of forming Chinese characters..."
"The second way in which Chinese characters were formed..."

This one has two perfect examples: 上 (up) and 下 (down).

You can imagine a water level, s. Something uper thanabove the level is 上, andwhile the things belower than the level it are 下.

There are three more examples, which are the easiest characters: 一(one), 二(two), 三(three).

I don't even need to explain them, right?

Compared to those pictographic characters, I think ideographic characters are more abstract.

They are not natural objects, but some conceptions from our ancestors' minds.

or:
"They are not objects that can be found in nature..."

also:
"...but abstract conceptions that our ancestors came up with."

These are more natural, casual ways of wording these parts of the sentence.

Feedback

Well done, Tammy!

Tammy's avatar
Tammy

Aug. 31, 2025

0

Thank you so much!

Have a nice weekend!

The methods by which Chinese characters were created (2)


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

You can read the first installment here: https://langcorrect.com/journals/the-methods-of-creating-chinese-characters-1/ The second formation of Chinese Characters is ideographic or self-explanatory.


You can read the first installment (or entry) here: https://langcorrect.com/journals/the-methods-of-creating-chinese-characters-1/


The second formation of Chinese Characters is ideographic or self-explanatory.

or "The second method of forming Chinese characters..." "The second way in which Chinese characters were formed..."

You can read the first installment here: https://langcorrect.com/journals/the-methods-of-creating-chinese-characters-1/


The second
formation ofway Chinese Ccharacters were formed is ideographic or self-explanatory.

This one has two perfect examples: 上 (up) and 下 (down).


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

You can imagine a water level, something uper than the level is 上, and the things lower than the level are 下.


You can imagine a water level, s. Something uper thanabove the level is 上, andwhile the things belower than the level it are 下.

You can imagine a water level, and something uphigher than the level is 上, and the things lower than the level are 下.

There are three more examples, which are the easiest characters: 一(one), 二(two), 三(three).


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

There are three more examples, which are the easiest characters: 一 (one), 二 (two), 三 (three).

Insert a space before each of the left parentheses marks.

I don't even need to explain them, right?


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Compared to those pictographic characters, I think ideographic characters are more abstract.


This sentence has been marked as perfect!

Compared to those pictographic characters I described in my previous post, I think ideographic characters are more abstract.

They are not natural objects, but some conceptions from our ancestors' minds.


They are not natural objects, but some conceptions from our ancestors' minds.

or: "They are not objects that can be found in nature..." also: "...but abstract conceptions that our ancestors came up with." These are more natural, casual ways of wording these parts of the sentence.

They are not natural objects, but some conceptions from our ancestors' minds.

suggestion: They represent not natural objects, but abstract concepts in our ancestors’ minds.

You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.

Go Premium