Today, I listened a 6-minute-English podcast about the thefts of old arteifacts.

There was a journalist, in the eintermission who brought an arteifact dating from 1800 (it's very old!)

and he said that after his buypurchase, he did a search to buy new old objects.

But he discovered that there are lots of traffic with stolen and looted objects.

In fact, it wasn't dating from now, because during the conquests, men looted the country they were in and bringought back objects to their country.

I don't understand what "it wasn't dating from now" means.

Now, with Ithe internet, it's a lot easier toofor a seller to sell their stolen object because before. Back then, they had to find an intermediary, and not now.w, they don't.

Several museums like, including Le Louvre in Paris, were criticiszed because offor knoowing aboutly buying stolen object.

In place of "including", you can also use "such as".

The experts think the solution is to more control.

The was a journalist, in the etransmission who bought an artefact dating from 1800 (it's very old!)

But he discovered that there areis a lots of traffic within stolen and looted objects.

In fact, it wasn't dating from now,is not anything new because during the times of the conquests, men looted the countryies they were in and bring backrought objects to their country.

Now, with the Internet, it's a lot easier toofor sellers to sell their stolen object because befores. Previously, they had to find an intermediary and not now., buy not anymore.

It flows better if you divide this into two sentences instead of one long sentence.

Several museums like Le Louvre in Paris were criticised because ofthey knoowing about buyingly bought stolen object.s.

The experts think the solution is to more control.