Sept. 13, 2025
Today I've seen the Bible and the Psalter in a trash bin.
My partner and I were going to the mall when he noticed it. I completely forgot what I was talking about. I couldn't continue anymore. I was really puzzled. Why had somebody done it? Who had thrown these books away, after all? What happened? What must happen to put the Bible in a random trash bin? It wasn't even in a garbage dump. It wasn't wrapped in a plastic bag, mixed with other "trash"... Only books inside a random small bin near grocery and alcoholic stores. Where was the man/woman going? Was throwing books away a spontaneous decision?
Don't get me wrong. I'm not too religious, but I can't comprehend it!
Was the man/woman frustrated? Did God disappoint him/her? I can understand it. Nowadays there are too many things that bring people to thoughts that if God existed he would never allow what's going on. Maybe the stranger has been grieving? Perhaps someone close to him/her had died?
The stranger HAD these books, therefore he/she must have believed in God, right? I might be wrong...
It's such a mystery. There are a lot of questions and no answer. I don’t have any idea! This situation shocked me, caught me off guard, and made me sad. What will people do next? What else will anybody decide to "throw away"? What's another piece of human culture I will see inside a trash bin tomorrow?
Today I've seen saw the Bible and the Psalter in a trash bin.
Same meaning but "I've seen" didn't sound correct. I'm not sure of the grammar rule that's doing that, but I think it has to do with the time frame being specified (Today)
I completely forgot what I was talking about. at the time and
Combining these two sentences makes the flow of the series of actions more natural to read.
I couldn't continue anymore.
I was really puzzled.
Why had somebody done it?
Who had thrown these books away, after all?
After all doesn't really work here.
What happened?
I think you could just delete this part as it is a bit redundant with the next sentence.
What must happenve happened for someone to put the Bible in a random trash bin?
More reading "flow" type of changes.
It wasn't even in a garbage dump.
It wasn't wrapped in a plastic bag, mixed with other "trash"... OnlyJust some books inside a random small bin near the grocery and alcoholic stores.
Where was the man/womaperson going?
Man/woman does work here, but person is a more natural word choice in conversation.
Was throwing the books away a spontaneous decision?
Don't get me wrong.,
I think combining these sentences is better
I'm not too religious, but I can't comprehend it!
Was the man/womaperson frustrated?
Did God disappoint him/herthem?
Same reasoning as before.
I canould understand ithat.
I think this word choice is better for both talking about a past event as well as a more "sympathetic" way to say it. Can is a bit more absolute yes or no. Whereas could is more... Conditional I guess? I hope that makes sense.
Nowadays there are too many things that bring people to thoughts that iof "If God existed he would never allow what's going on."
This isn't a strict grammar rule, but when talking about a specific thought, adding quotations is a good way to clearly show what that thought is. This might be more a personal style choice admittedly, but I think it is a useful tool to distinguish thoughts from the rest of the text.
Maybe the stranger hasd been grieving?
Generally this story has been in past tense so it feels a little better with "had"
Perhaps someone close to him/her had died?
The stranger HAD these books, therefore he/sthey must have believed in God, right?
I might be wrong...
It's such a mystery.
There are a lot of questions andwith no answers.
I don’t have any idea!
This situation shocked me, caught me off guard, and made me sad.
What will people do next?
What else will anysomebody decide to "throw away"?
What's another piece of human culture I will see inside a trash bin tomorrow?
Feedback
Great work overall. I just had some tweaks to the overall flow, some word tenses and admittedly some things that might be personal preference. Definitely had no issues understanding the content though and your spelling and overall word selection was great.
Shocked |
Today I've seen the Bible and the Psalter in a trash bin. Today I Same meaning but "I've seen" didn't sound correct. I'm not sure of the grammar rule that's doing that, but I think it has to do with the time frame being specified (Today) |
My partner and I were going to the mall when he noticed it. |
I completely forgot what I was talking about. I completely forgot what I was talking about Combining these two sentences makes the flow of the series of actions more natural to read. |
I couldn't continue anymore. I couldn't continue anymore. |
I was really puzzled. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
Why had somebody done it? This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
Who had thrown these books away, after all? Who had thrown these books away After all doesn't really work here. |
What happened?
I think you could just delete this part as it is a bit redundant with the next sentence. |
What must happen to put the Bible in a random trash bin? What must ha More reading "flow" type of changes. |
It wasn't even in a garbage dump. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
It wasn't wrapped in a plastic bag, mixed with other "trash"... Only books inside a random small bin near grocery and alcoholic stores. It wasn't wrapped in a plastic bag, mixed with other "trash"... |
Where was the man/woman going? Where was the Man/woman does work here, but person is a more natural word choice in conversation. |
Was throwing books away a spontaneous decision? Was throwing the books away a spontaneous decision? |
Don't get me wrong. Don't get me wrong I think combining these sentences is better |
I'm not too religious, but I can't comprehend it! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
Was the man/woman frustrated? Was the |
Did God disappoint him/her? Did God disappoint Same reasoning as before. |
I can understand it. I c I think this word choice is better for both talking about a past event as well as a more "sympathetic" way to say it. Can is a bit more absolute yes or no. Whereas could is more... Conditional I guess? I hope that makes sense. |
Nowadays there are too many things that bring people to thoughts that if God existed he would never allow what's going on. Nowadays there are too many things that bring people to thoughts This isn't a strict grammar rule, but when talking about a specific thought, adding quotations is a good way to clearly show what that thought is. This might be more a personal style choice admittedly, but I think it is a useful tool to distinguish thoughts from the rest of the text. |
Maybe the stranger has been grieving? Maybe the stranger ha Generally this story has been in past tense so it feels a little better with "had" |
Perhaps someone close to him/her had died? This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
The stranger HAD these books, therefore he/she must have believed in God, right? The stranger HAD these books, therefore |
I might be wrong... This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
It's such a mystery. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
There are a lot of questions and no answer. There are a lot of questions |
I don’t have any idea! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
This situation shocked me, caught me off guard, and made me sad. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
What will people do next? This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
What else will anybody decide to "throw away"? What else will |
What's another piece of human culture I will see inside a trash bin tomorrow? This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium