This happens because the two countries have different ways tof seeing things.

These rules and a difficult life make their living conditions much worse.

What i say, It’I'm about to say is not completely recent, but it proves my point.

But the government, North Korea, constantly keeps your implications.

Sorry, I am not too sure what you mean by this sentence

Only the future mustcan say what will happen.

Feel free to share your opinion,. I am really interested to know.

At this point, it is superhas become clear to usthe world that South Korea and North Korea don’t get along very wellhave the best relationship.

“Super” is not used in English. Then, I changed “us” to “the world” since with “us” it’s not really clear who you’re talking about. Then, while you’re tense or simple present is technically correct, has become reads more natural. Also, get along isn’t really something you would say regarding countries, it’s more about people.

This happens because the two countries have different ways tof seeeing things.

Speaking for myself, I feel really feel bad for the North Koreans.

If you were to add the “the” before North Koreans, then you would have to add an adjective describing what specific part of thr North Korean population you feel bad about. Example: I feel really bad for the North Koreans that live below the poverty line. If you’re not describing them, the “the” is not needed.

These rules and a difficult life laws they live under, and the poverty much of the population faces makes their living much worssituation laughable.

You would say “these” if you had mentioned beforehand the “rules” you were talking about. Although, I’m pretty sure you wanted to say “laws” not “rules”. Then, you can’t say that their laws and difficult life makes their living situation worse since the “difficult life” cannot be a cause, it can only be the result of those laws and other factors (hope I explained myself well). That’s why I changed the second part of the sentence into being about the poverty they face, since that can actually be a cause for a bad living situation. You can change the “laughable” into other adjectives like “horrendous”, “pitiful”, etc.

What iI’m about to say, It’swhile not completely recent, but it proves my point.

I kept the part about how it “proves your point” since it’s grammatically correct, but I don’t understand how the next sentence you said is suppose to prove that North Koreans live in horrendous conditions.

Frankly, I don't really don't know when this “war”all started happened ing, but neither side reached a conclusionNorth Korea has not stopped doing it.

You cannot call it a war, and I feel like “conflict” is too strong of a word. I used “this” because, in this case, you actually had mentioned the balloons before, so the reader will actually understand what you’re referencing. “Neither side reached a conclusion” is wrong unless South and North Korean officials actually sat down and tried to reach an agreement over it (which I doubt happened). Even then, you should probably say “neither side reached an agreement”.

But the government, North Korea, constantly keeps your implicIt seems like the North Korean government keeps constantly defying our expectations.

I think you wanted to say “expectations” instead of “implications”. Then, you’re using North Korea as an adjective, so you should either say North Korean government or the government of North Korea. I also changed your sentence quite a lot to make it fit into your paragraph since your original one felt really out of place and unnecessary.

Only the future must say whatime will tell how this strange occurrence will happend.

The idiom is “only time will tell”, but you need to add a clause that says WHAT will the future tell, that’s why added the “how this strange…”

What do you think about it?

Would personally say something more specific, but your sentence is correct.