The exception proves the rule The exception proves the rule

You could also capitalise your title: The Exception Proves The Rule

In my life I offten hear the phrase "Tthe exception proves the rule" from people, who present this phrase as an argument in different discussions. In my life I often hear the phrase "the exception proves the rule" from people who present this phrase as an argument in different discussions.

By the phrase they mean -that the existaence of fact that is derived from a commomn case - makes this rule better than it could be without an exceprtion. By the phrase they mean that the existence of fact that is derived from a common case makes this rule better than it could be without an exception.

This sentence is a little confusing - I would recommend rewording it to be a bit shorter/more concise.

In my opinion, thereis is a small misconceprtion which formed from two momentcauses. In my opinion, this is a small misconception which formed from two causes.

I don't think "moment" works here - I would go for "causes" or "origins". You could also rephrase it was: "... which is due to two reasons."

The first one that people feel the rule more sharply when among a lot of similar examples / /cases (like a flat floor) your attention hit ois drawn by one uinconvienient exception (like a knock-outn out of place plank). The first one that people feel the rule more sharply when among a lot of similar examples/cases (like a flat floor) your attention is drawn by one inconvenient exception (like an out of place plank).

More natural phrasing: "The first one that people feel the rule more sharply when among a lot of similar examples/cases, your attention is drawn on by one inconvenient exception - for example, on a flat floor, you will immediately notice an out of place plank." Your attention is often DRAWN by something. Not like drawing with a pencil, but attracted towards.

And the second one is just as coolthat the phrase sounds and makes able to give a lucky punch tocool and is a punchy saying to counter others in a discussion. And the second one is just that the phrase sounds cool and is a punchy saying to counter others in a discussion.

Punchy = having an immediate impact, forceful, vivid; usually used to describe writing or speech A punch just makes me think of a literal punch, so I don't think it would work well here, though I get what you are going for. You can "counter" someone's argument with your own.

My consclusion is simple and obvious - any rule without exceptions is stronger than the same rule with them. My conclusion is simple and obvious - any rule without exceptions is stronger than the same rule with them.