I remember being always watching the TV in order to attend tomarvel at all the gold medals and to miss nothing.

By the way, this year, we performed and we figured amongst the best countries (withbased on the number of gold medals).

Hands down, the big mOne of the best French Olympians of these Olympic Games is Léon Marchand, the french swimmer with his 4 gold medalswho won four gold medals for swimming.

I remember his first one, when he clearly dominated all his opponents and won by more than 50 metters (t. That's huge).!

I was streaming in front of my TV to support him, but he deffineitely didn't need help from anybody.

IHe is an incredible judo, he already had won 2 oka who had already won two Olympic titles.

To refer to someone who does judo, you write them as a judoka: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teddy_Riner

But tThis year was special for him, in front of his own public, he didn't have the choice to win because he performed extremely well in front of his home country/home crowd.

I modified your sentence to sound more natural.

And he made it twiceIn fact, he won two gold medals!

One aloneHe won one individual medal and another otherne with the French team.

I modified this sentence to sound as if an American commentator is commenting on the performance of their athletes.

TheHe easily obtained his first final alone was pretty simpledividual medal at his best event (in the 2024 Paris Olympics).

Same feedback as below.

However, the second final who opposed the French team to the Japanese team was way more difficultit was much more difficult to obtain the second gold medal since the French team was going up against another formidable team from Japan.

They were losing by 3 1 (t3 to 1. The game finished when the first team reached 4) points.

ButHowever, the French team were strongas mentally strong, and they managed to come back to 3 -3.

The final fight was choosen with a random wheel.

And iIt bumped into Tthe category "more than 100 kg," which meant Teddy Rinner willould fight again.

The 2024 Olympics is in the past, so use the conditional or past tense.

And oObviously, he won.

At the end, when they celebrated their title, it was a little cringe when the French president, Emmanuel Macron, hugged Teddy, only because he wanted to look "cool"."

During the very last way, I went to Lilles, a city in France located in the North, to watch the little and the big final of handball.

Both teams were platying very well, and fianally, Spain won by 1 goal.

However, the final was way more closed, Danecloser. Denmark won by 11 goals, which is the record of the easiest win.

Danemark is the French spelling of Denmark.

I was disappointed because the atmosphere had came out to bewas incredible,; there were supporters of both teams.

Please tell me what you thought of my English and give me some subjects I could talk about in the future!

You can talk about how you felt while watching the 2026 Winter Olympics. For example, how did you feel watching Alysa Liu or Eileen Gu? What else did you get from the Norwegian athlete who admitted to cheating on his ex-girlfriend on international television? Do you prefer watching the Winter Olympics or the Summer Olympics? Tell me about your experience with playing handball and retiring from that sport.

In 2024, there were the Olympic Games were in France.

In English we normally don't use a general situation as a subject, instead we prefer specific subjects (like "The Olympic Games" here)

I remember being always watching the TV in order to attend tosee all the gold medals and to miss nothing.

"attend to" = "care for (a sick person, plants) or "complete (obligations)"

Just plain "see" is better here.

By the way, this year, we performed well and we figurranked among the best countries (withfor the number of gold medals).

"we performed" in this context is basically just "we did", you need to specify an action or adverb to go with it for it to mean anything.

Hands down, the big man of these Olympic Games iwas Léon Marchand, the french swimmer with his 4 gold medals.

The 2024 Olympic Games are in the past, so "was" is more natural than "is"

I remember his first one, when he clearly dominated all his opponents and won by more than 50 metters (that's huge).

I was streaming in front ofthe games on my TV to support him, but he deffineitely didn't need help from anybody.

Another incredible sportsman who performcompeted was Teddy Rinner.

Incredible judo, he had already had won 2 olympic titles.

But this year was special for him, in front of his own public, he didn't have the (choice to/option) to not win.

In this kind of sentence where we talk about someone being obliged to do something, we would focus on the bad option ("not winning" in this case)

Once alone and the other time with the French team.

The first solo final alone was pretty simple.

However, the second final who opposedere the French team tofaced the Japanese team was way more difficult.

Prefer human subjects over situational subjects.

They were losing by 3 -1 (the game finished when the first team reached 4).

But the French team were strong mentally, and they managed to come back to 3 -3.

The final fight was choose with a random wheel.

And it bump into Tlanded on the category "more than 100 kg" which meant Teddy Rinner willould fight again.

"will" -> "would" since we're talking about past tense here.

It was an increidible comeback.

At the end, when they celebrated their title, it was a little cringe when the French president Emmanuel Macron hugged Teddy, only because he only wanted to look "cool".

During the very last wday, I went to Lilles, a city in France located in the North, to watch the (little and the big final (?)) semi-final and final of handball.

Not fully sure what "little and big final" is, so I guessed.

The little semi-final was thrilling.

Both teams were platying very well and fianally, Spain won by 1 goal.

However, the final was way moreless closed, Danenmark won by 11 goals, which is thea record ofor the easiest win.

A close final would be one where either team could have fun.

I was disappointed because the atmosphere had came out to been incredible, there were supporters of both teams.

Please tell me what you thought of my English and give me some subjects I could talk about!

In 2024, there were the Olympic Games were (held) in France.

Just more standard phrasing :)

I remember beingI was always watching the TV (in order) to attend tosee all the gold medals and to miss nothing.

Maybe "all the gold medal winners" or "gold medallists"?
You don't really need "in order". It isn't incorrect but not super common.

I changed "attend to" to "see" because the meaning doesn't quite fit. "Attend" is used if you're there in person, rather than watching on TV. You could also say "catch who won the gold medals" or "catch all the gold medal ceremonies".

Hands down, the big man of these Olympic Games is Léon Marchand, the fFrench swimmer with his 4 gold medals.

I remember his first one, when he clearly dominated all his opponents and won by more than 50 metters (that's huge).

Double letters are annoying. I mix them up sometimes too :)

If you want to use British spelling, it's "metres", but if you use American spelling, it's fine as it is.

I was streaming in front[the race] ofn my TV to support him, but he deffineitely didn't need help from anybody.

If you stream "in front of" your TV, it sounds like you were running a stream on your computer or phone, while sitting in front of the TV! If you used the TV, then the stream was "on" your TV :)

I added "the race" because I thought you meant you were watching the race. But if you were livestreaming yourself online, then you could say "I was streaming on Twitch/Youtube".

Another incredible sportsman who performed was Teddy Rinner.

IHe's incredible at judo, heand had already had won 2 oOlympic titles.

But this year was special for him, i. In front of his own public, he didn't have the choice to wicountrymen, losing wasn't an option.

I changed the phrase to make the meaning more clear. "He didn't have the choice to win" can sound like the competition was rigged so he wouldn't be able to win, haha

Once alone and the otheragain with the French team.

However, the second final, who opposedere the French team toversed the Japanese team, was way more difficult.

They were losing by 3 -1 (the game finished when the first team reached 4).

But the French team were strong mentally, and they managed to make a come back and bring it to 3 -3.

The final fight was choosen with a random wheel.

And it bumped into Tthe category "more than 100 kg", which meants Teddy Rinner will fight again.

It was an increidible comeback.

During the very last wday, I went to Lilles, a city in France located in the North, to watch the little and the bigsemifinal and final of handball.

I'm sorry, I guessed the meaning because I wasn't sure whether "little and big final" meant the last two games, or the finals of a small league and big league.

The little semifinal was thrilling.

Same as before, "semifinal" might not be right if it wasn't the meaning you were going for.

Both teams were platying very well and fianally, Spain won by 1 goal.

However, the final was way more closed, Daneof a curbstomp. Denmark won by 11 goals, which is the record ofor the easiest win ever.

There are different words you could use instead of "curbstomp", like "a crushing defeat", "way more one-sided", or "way more of a thrashing".

I was disappointed because the atmosphere had caome out to be incredible, there were supporters of both teams.

Having this as one sentence is fine in casual writing, so I won't change it, but in formal writing the comma would become a full stop (period). :)

Please tell me what you thought of my English and give me some subjects I could talk about!

In 2024, there were the Olympic Games were held in France.

Your original text was not grammatically incorrect, but it would flow more smoothly like this.

I remember being always watching the TV in order to attend totrack all the gold medals and to miss nothing.

I'm not sure exactly what you mean by attend to. Better verbs might be to track (follow closely, like if you are tallying the rankings), or witness (see firsthand, watch every gold medal match).

By the way, this year, we performed well and we figurranked among the best countries (with the number of gold medals).

Second comma isn't necessary.
Performed well, or excelled - by itself "performed" only indicates that you were there.
Ranked is a better word here than figured.
Even more fluid would be to say "we ranked among the countries with the most gold medals."

Hands down, the big man of these Olympic Games is Léon Marchand, the fFrench swimmer with his 4 gold medals.

I remember his first one, when he clearly dominated all his opponents and won by more than 50 metters (that's huge).

I was stcreaming in front of my TV to support him, but he deffineitely didn't need help from anybody.

Another incredible sportsman who performedat these Olympics was Teddy Rinner.

Again, I think performed is too soft a word for what you want to say here. You can just say "he was there" (like I've said above), since you're about to go into more details. Or you could say something like "who brought home Gold medals"

Incredible at judo, he already had won 2 oOlympic titles.

But this year was special for him, in front of his own publiccountrymen, he didn't have theany choice but to win.

The last part of the sentence is a bit of an English "set phrase." I know it sounds awkward!

And he madedid it twice!

One aloneAnd he did it twice - one as a solo competitor and the other with the French team.

This by itself isn't a complete sentence; I'd combine it with the previous sentence.
"One alone" just reads a bit odd to the native English ear. You could say "once alone" - but I think adding a bit more context as shows above would be better.

It was a piece of cake for the legend he wais.

Even though the final was in the past, he is still a legend in the present.

However, the second final who opposich paired the French team to the Japanese team was way more difficult.

They were losing by 3 1to 1. (tThe game finished when the first team reached 4).)

You really have two complete sentences here, so I would adjust the periods as shown.

But the French team were strong mentally, and they managed to come back to 3 to 3.

Or even better, "they managed to come back to tie the score 3 to 3." That also avoids having the short word "to" twice so close together.

The final fight was choosen with a random spin of the wheel.

And it bumped into Tthe category "more than 100 kg" which meant Teddy Rinner willould fight again.

It was an increidible comeback.

At the end, when they celebrated their title, it was a little crembarrassinge when the French president Emmanuel Macron hugged Teddy, only because he wanted to look "cool".

To say something is "a little cringe" is slang used by young people in the USA. It would work amongst friends, but talking to a more general audience I would choose a more formal word.

During the very last wday, I went to Lilles, a city in France located in the North, to watch the little and the big final of handball.

I think you might mean semi-final and final (instead of little and big final).

The little semi-final was thrilling.

Both teams were platying very well and fianally, Spain won by 1one goal.

However, the final was way more closed, Danemuch closer. Denmark won by 11 goals, which iset the record of the easiest win.

I was disappointed because the atmosphere had came out to be incredible, there were supporters of both teams.

I'm a little confused by this sentence. I think you mean you were disappointed because it was such an easy win...but what did it do to the atmosphere? It started incredible but then it wasn't? Wouldn't it still have been incredible for the Danish fans? Maybe you mean "the atmosphere had promised to be incredible, with supporters of both teams."

I hope you enjoyed reading my text!

I did - and learned more about a bit more about judo and handball.

Please tell me what you thought of my English and give me some subjects I could talk about!