Are lLong wWalks mMore uUseful tThan sShort oOnes? Are Long Walks More Useful Than Short Ones?

Capitalize most words in a title.

Today I've read an article from onea university. Today I read an article from a university.

There was a research about the influence of the length of walks on the health of different people. There was research about the influence of the length of walks on the health of different people.

The research showed that long walks are more useful, even if you have low daily activity. The research showed that long walks are more useful, even if you have low daily activity.

Long walks can make your heart more healthier and stronger, prevent heart attacks, etc. Long walks can make your heart healthier and stronger, prevent heart attacks, etc.

The suffix “er” means “more”. You could say “Long walks can make your heart more healthy and strong” or “Long walks can make your heart healthier and stronger”

I don't believe that a simple walk can do it withimprove my health. I don't believe that a simple walk can improve my health.

I think that is what you are attempting to say, I’m not exactly sure.

EverythingAll that I do during the walk is just mtakinge step byafter step. All that I do during the walk is just take step after step.

Again, I think that is what you are going for.

So, I want to learn more about this case and read more researches. So, I want to learn more about this case and read more research.

I also know that long walks can hurtbe harmful to knees and feet, especially, elderly person's knees and feet for the elderly. I also know that long walks can be harmful to knees and feet, especially for the elderly.

This avoids redundancy.

It's a double-edged sword, so you need to walk neither too much nor too little. It's a double-edged sword, you need to walk neither too much nor too little.

I would suggest- “It's a double-edged sword, you shouldn’t walk too much nor too little.” Either is grammatically correct, but I think this flows better.