June 29, 2026
I went to a woodworking class today and made a lamp and it looks absolutely, incredibly gorgeous! I got covered in wood shavings while working on it, and they made me all itchy. Too bad I can't send photos here, or I'd totally share them with you all!
I went to a woodworking class today and made a lamp and it looks absolutely, /incredibly gorgeous!
I went to a woodworking class today and made a lamp and it looks absolutely/incredibly gorgeous!
To me, “…absolutely, incredibly…” is redundant.
I got covered in wood shavings while working on it, and they made me anll itchy. I got covered in wood shavings while working on it, and they made me anll itchy.
Feedback
I’m interested in sharing photos on this site as well. I hope they add it as a feature in the future.
Diary
I went to a woodworking class today and made a lamp and it looks absolutely, incredibly gorgeous!
I got covered in wood shavings while working on it, and they made me all itchy.
Too bad I can't send photos here, or I'd totally share them with you all!
I went to a woodworking class today and made a lamp and ithat looks absolutely, incredibly gorgeous!
I went to a woodworking class today and made a lamp that looks absolutely incredibly gorgeous!
I just have the feel of it being smoother with the no "and it" just that. Like someone else said though, not that what you said is wrong, at least I would agree with that. Though actually if you did keep i think "lamp, and it" becuase if it is a sentence after the 'and' that could stand alone then comma I believe.
Also, I believe the comma would be different. I wasn't sure but thought it didn't fit. Ai seems to agree (feel free to verify more though). The idea being you could say. "is it cool?" response "Absolutely, incredibly gorgeous!" But if you are saying it is absoutely incredibly gorgeous with absolutely chaining to incredibly, then no comma.
I got covered in wood shavings while working on it, and theywhich made me all itchy.
I got covered in wood shavings while working on it, which made me all itchy.
Not to say the before is incorrect. I just offer an alternative which feels a bit smoother maybe. Then again, maybe not? I feel like in some situations I would say the which and in some maybe the they. But maybe more likely the which. Or maybe actually I would say. "and that made me itchy." Refering perhaps to the whole situation. But maybe this is all just preference. Gives you a viewpoint at least.
Feedback
Yeah, would be cool to send pictures! Keep it up! None of these make things not understandable and could maybe be chalked up to preference differences (and not like grammatically wrong)(and not like the sentences sound super unnatural anyway) aside from the errent comma here and there .
I went to a woodworking class today and made a lamp and it looksthat ended up absolutely, incredibly gorgeous!
I went to a woodworking class today and made a lamp that ended up absolutely, incredibly gorgeous!
The second "and" is a bit awkward but would probably be fine in conversation, so this is just a suggestion that keeps the excited tone and emphasizes that it's the end result of your work.
I got covered in wood shavings while working on it, and they made me all itchy.
Too bad I can't send photos here, or I'd totally share them with you all!
Feedback
Well done, on both the writing and the lamp. Wood working is so fun!
|
Diary This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
I went to a woodworking class today and made a lamp and it looks absolutely, incredibly gorgeous!
I went to a woodworking class today and made a lamp The second "and" is a bit awkward but would probably be fine in conversation, so this is just a suggestion that keeps the excited tone and emphasizes that it's the end result of your work.
I went to a woodworking class today and made a lamp I just have the feel of it being smoother with the no "and it" just that. Like someone else said though, not that what you said is wrong, at least I would agree with that. Though actually if you did keep i think "lamp, and it" becuase if it is a sentence after the 'and' that could stand alone then comma I believe. Also, I believe the comma would be different. I wasn't sure but thought it didn't fit. Ai seems to agree (feel free to verify more though). The idea being you could say. "is it cool?" response "Absolutely, incredibly gorgeous!" But if you are saying it is absoutely incredibly gorgeous with absolutely chaining to incredibly, then no comma. This sentence has been marked as perfect!
I went to a woodworking class today and made a lamp and it looks absolutely To me, “…absolutely, incredibly…” is redundant. |
|
I got covered in wood shavings while working on it, and they made me all itchy. This sentence has been marked as perfect!
I got covered in wood shavings while working on it, Not to say the before is incorrect. I just offer an alternative which feels a bit smoother maybe. Then again, maybe not? I feel like in some situations I would say the which and in some maybe the they. But maybe more likely the which. Or maybe actually I would say. "and that made me itchy." Refering perhaps to the whole situation. But maybe this is all just preference. Gives you a viewpoint at least. This sentence has been marked as perfect! I got covered in wood shavings while working on it, and they made me anll itchy. I got covered in wood shavings while working on it, and they made me anll itchy. |
|
Too bad I can't send photos here, or I'd totally share them with you all! This sentence has been marked as perfect! This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium