Sept. 23, 2025
Dead singers could sing again.
Currently, we are used to seeing how good (or bad) I.A could give us technological advancement. Many things which seemed impossible, now could happen!
And one of them is that the dead singers “could sing again” with I.A fans took their voice and used to sing current songs or say something. I remember one time, when I saw a video where Freddy Mercury from Queen, singing beat it, by Michael Jackson. It was beautiful, and sounded almost perfect. It can easily confuse someone who doesn't know. Of course, we need to be conscious and take care about what we are doing. Is that illegal or not?
Our voice is unique and can't be used for bad purposes, like fake ads, I seriously believe, in the future, if this has, for example, an official company to carry these voices. This could be a nice tool to hear the dead singers again.
Atualmente, estamos acostumados a ver o quão bom (ou ruim) o I.A. pode nos proporcionar avanços tecnológicos. Muitas coisas que pareciam impossíveis, agora podem acontecer!
E uma delas é que os cantores mortos "poderiam cantar novamente" com os fãs do I.A., que pegaram suas vozes e as usaram para cantar músicas atuais ou dizer algo. Lembro-me de uma vez, quando vi um vídeo do Freddy Mercury, do Queen, cantando "beat it", do Michael Jackson. Era lindo e soava quase perfeito. Pode facilmente confundir alguém que não conhece. Claro, precisamos ser conscientes e tomar cuidado com o que estamos fazendo. Isso é ilegal ou não?
Nossa voz é única e não pode ser usada para fins maliciosos, como anúncios falsos, acredito seriamente que, no futuro, se houver, por exemplo, uma empresa oficial para transmitir essas vozes. Isso poderia ser uma ótima ferramenta para ouvir os cantores mortos novamente.
Dead singers could sing again.
CurrentlyThese days, we are used to seeing how good (or bad) I.A could giveAI can bring us technological advancements.
(1) "These days" sounds more appropriate here. I think "currently" is more specific, while "these days" refers more broadly to the present and any recent time period.
(2) The abbreviation is "AI", which stands for "artificial intelligence".
(3) "Can" seems more appropriate. "Could" sounds less certain than "can", but AI has already obviously brought about numerous technological developments.
(4) A better word to use instead of "give" is "bring". "Bring" is a fairly common word to use when talking about benefits and advancements.
Many things which (once) seemed impossible, now could can now happen!
Switching the word order around will make it sound more natural.
And one of them is that the dead singers “could can "sing again”, with AI.A fans tookaking their voices and useding them to sing currentmodern songs or say something.
(1) "The dead singers" implies that you're referring to a specific group of singers in particular. However, you're referring to dead singers in general, so "the" is not used.
(2) "Singers" implies more than one dead singer, so "voice" should be plural too ("voices").
(3) You need to specify what it is that's being used.
(4) "Current songs" is okay, but I think "modern songs" sounds better.
I remember one time, when I saw a video whereof Freddy Mercury from Queen, singing b"Beat it,It" by Michael Jackson.
(1) The placement of the commas at the end break the flow of the sentence unnaturally. You can remove them.
(2) Song titles should be properly capitalised.
(3) Placing the song title in quotation marks will make it clear to the reader that it's a song title.
It was beautiful, and sounded almost perfect.
It can easily confuse someone who doesn't know.
Of course, we need to be conscious and takbe careful about what we are doing.
"Take care about" doesn't sound natural.
Is thatis illegal or not?
Since using AI to imitate voices is the current subject of your writing, "this" might sound more appropriate here.
Our voice iss are unique and can't be used for badmalicious purposes, like fake ads,. I seriously believe, that in the future, if this hasere were, for example, an official company to carrybroadcast these voices.,
(1) "Our" refers to multiple people, so again, "voice" should be plural.
(2) "Bad purposes" is understandable, but "malicious" will sound more fluent.
(3) The number of commas in the sentence makes it a little hard to read. I have removed some commas to help with this.
(4) The second sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the one below.
Tthis could be a nice tool to hear the dead singers again.
Sept. 30, 2025
Holy! thanks for all explanations!
|
Dead singers could sing again. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Currently, we are used to seeing how good (or bad) I.A could give us technological advancement.
(1) "These days" sounds more appropriate here. I think "currently" is more specific, while "these days" refers more broadly to the present and any recent time period. (2) The abbreviation is "AI", which stands for "artificial intelligence". (3) "Can" seems more appropriate. "Could" sounds less certain than "can", but AI has already obviously brought about numerous technological developments. (4) A better word to use instead of "give" is "bring". "Bring" is a fairly common word to use when talking about benefits and advancements. |
|
I remember one time, when I saw a video where Freddy Mercury from Queen, singing beat it, by Michael Jackson. I remember one time, (1) The placement of the commas at the end break the flow of the sentence unnaturally. You can remove them. (2) Song titles should be properly capitalised. (3) Placing the song title in quotation marks will make it clear to the reader that it's a song title. |
|
It was beautiful, and sounded almost perfect. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
It can easily confuse someone who doesn't know. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Of course, we need to be conscious and take care about what we are doing. Of course, we need to be conscious and "Take care about" doesn't sound natural. |
|
Is that illegal or not? Is th Since using AI to imitate voices is the current subject of your writing, "this" might sound more appropriate here. |
|
Our voice is unique and can't be used for bad purposes, like fake ads, I seriously believe, in the future, if this has, for example, an official company to carry these voices. Our voice (1) "Our" refers to multiple people, so again, "voice" should be plural. (2) "Bad purposes" is understandable, but "malicious" will sound more fluent. (3) The number of commas in the sentence makes it a little hard to read. I have removed some commas to help with this. (4) The second sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the one below. |
|
This could be a nice tool to hear the dead singers again.
|
|
Many things which seemed impossible, now could happen! Many things which (once) seemed impossible Switching the word order around will make it sound more natural. |
|
And one of them is that the dead singers “could sing again” with I.A fans took their voice and used to sing current songs or say something. And one of them is that (1) "The dead singers" implies that you're referring to a specific group of singers in particular. However, you're referring to dead singers in general, so "the" is not used. (2) "Singers" implies more than one dead singer, so "voice" should be plural too ("voices"). (3) You need to specify what it is that's being used. (4) "Current songs" is okay, but I think "modern songs" sounds better. |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium