Futrther more, no matter how kind or polite people are really have such characters, they wcould lose that because they don not have any affordance that help you (side of their personality at a time of crisis. If they do have affordancethe chance to help, they will do that, but it is impossible to guarantee, especially right after thean earthquake). Furthermore, no matter how kind or polite people are, they could lose that side of their personality at a time of crisis. If they do have the chance to help, they will, but it is impossible to guarantee, especially right after an earthquake.

Futrher more, no matter how kind or polite people are really have such characters, they would lose that because they don not have any affordance that help you (If they have affordance, they will do that, but it is impossible, especially right after the earthquake) Futrhermore, no matter how kind or polite people are really have such characters, they would lose that because they don not have any affordance that help you (If they have affordance, they will do that, but it is impossible, especially right after the earthquake)

The wording here is a bit clunky. It sounds like you're saying that after an earthquake like what you describe, even nice and kind people will find out that it can be hard to help other people when the earthquake ends, since they have to take care of their own

Futrther more, no matter how kind or polite people are really have such characters, they would lose that, because they don not have any affordance thatcannot afford to help you (Iif they have affordancecan, they will do that, but it is impossible, especially right after thean earthquake). Furthermore, no matter how kind or polite people are, they would lose that, because they cannot afford to help you (if they can, they will, but it is impossible, especially right after an earthquake).

FutrMY GUESS: Further more, no matter how kind or polite people are really have such characters, they would lose that because they don not have any affordance that help you (If they have affordance, they will do that, but it is impossible, especially right after the earthquake)normally are, survival instincts will kick and many people will panic. MY GUESS: Furthermore, no matter how kind or polite people normally are, survival instincts will kick and many people will panic.

sShould yYou cCome to Japan? Should You Come to Japan?

sShould you come to Japan? Should you come to Japan?

sShould you come to Japan? Should you come to Japan?

sOPTION A: Should you come to Japan? OPTION B: Should people come to Japan? OPTION A: Should you come to Japan? OPTION B: Should people come to Japan?

I originally wanted to talk about my favorite subjects, but I changed the topic because something has happened recently. I originally wanted to talk about my favorite subjects, but I changed the topic because something has happened recently.

"because something happened recently" is another option

I originally wanted to talkwrite about mya favorite subjects, but I changed the topic because something has happened recof a recent evently. I originally wanted to write about a favorite subject, but changed the topic because of a recent event.

SUGGESTION: When writing, avoid repeating the word "I" many times in the same sentence. (This is no problem when speaking, but written and spoken English differ slightly in terms of grammar and vocabulary.) アドバイス：文章を書く際は、同じ文の中で「I」という単語を数回続けて使わないようにしましょう。 （話す分には問題ありませんが、書き言葉と話し言葉では、文法や語彙が若干異なります。）

It is the earthquake that I want to talk about. It is the earthquake that I want to talk about.

It is earthquake that I want to about want to talk about an earthquake. I want to talk about an earthquake.

It sounds more normal to me, in this case, to lead with "I want to".

It is earthquake that I want to talk about. It is earthquake that I want to talk about.

It is earthquake that I want to aboutOPTION A (複数の地震について書く場合): I want to write about recent earthquakes. OPTION B (もしたった1つの地震について書くとしたら): I want to write about the recent earthquake in Japan. OPTION A (複数の地震について書く場合): I want to write about recent earthquakes. OPTION B (もしたった1つの地震について書くとしたら): I want to write about the recent earthquake in Japan.

In recent weeks, there arehave been a lot of earthquakes which areof a seismic intensity of 4~-6. In recent weeks, there have been a lot of earthquakes of a seismic intensity of 4-6.

In recent weeks, there arehave been a lot of earthquakes which areith a seismic intensity of 4~-6. In recent weeks, there have been a lot of earthquakes with a seismic intensity of 4-6.

"there are" would be present tense, but since it is "in recent weeks", that's talking about past time you could also say "...a lot of earthquakes that had a seismic ..."

In recent weeks, there arehave been a lot of earthquakes whichthat are a seismic intensity of 4~6. In recent weeks, there have been a lot of earthquakes that are a seismic intensity of 4~6.

OPTION A: In recent weeks, there arehave been a lot of earthquakes which are ahave had seismic intensityies of 4~6. OPTION B: In recent weeks, there have been a lot of moderately strong earthquakes (in Japan). OPTION A: In recent weeks, there have been a lot of earthquakes which have had seismic intensities of 4~6. OPTION B: In recent weeks, there have been a lot of moderately strong earthquakes (in Japan).

NOTE: The recent recent earthquakes were Venezuela were 7.2 and 7.5 in strength, so I am guessing you are writing about Japan.

First, I'll talk about the earthquake in Japan, especially, focusing on Kanto area (includeing Saitama, Tokyo, Yokohama,Chiba,and so on) First, I'll talk about the earthquake in Japan, especially, focusing on Kanto area (including Saitama, Tokyo, Yokohama,Chiba,and so on)

First, I'll talk about the earthquake in Japan, especially, focusing on Kanto area (includeing Saitama, Tokyo, Yokohama, Chiba, and so on). First, I'll talk about the earthquake in Japan, especially focusing on Kanto area (including Saitama, Tokyo, Yokohama, Chiba, and so on).

First, I'll talk about the earthquake in Japan, especifically, focusing on Kanto area (includeing Saitama, Tokyo, Yokohama, Chiba,and so on etc.) First, I'll talk about the earthquake in Japan, specifically focusing on Kanto area (including Saitama, Tokyo, Yokohama, Chiba, etc.)

In writing, we normally use etc. as apposed to so on (but in speaking it's okay)

First, I'll talk about the most recent earthquake in Japan, especially, focusing on Kanto area (include Saitama, Tokyo, Yokohama,Chiba,and so on) First, I'll talk about the most recent earthquake in Japan, especially, focusing on Kanto area (include Saitama, Tokyo, Yokohama,Chiba,and so on)

Kanto consistsis located on top of 4 tectonic plates and is one of the world’s leading places where earthquakes happenmost seismically active places in the world. Kanto is located on top of 4 tectonic plates and is one of the most seismically active places in the world.

Kanto consists of 4 tectonic plates and is one of the world’s leading places where earthquakes happen. Kanto consists of 4 tectonic plates and is one of the world’s leading places where earthquakes happen.

is Kanto one of the world's leading earthquake zones? if it is, then it would need the "is" that I added.

Kanto consists of 4 tectonic plates, and is one of the world’s leading places where earthquakes happen locations. Kanto consists of 4 tectonic plates, and is one of the world’s leading earthquake locations.

Kanto consists of 4 tectonic plates andFour tectonic plates merge in the Kanto area of Japan, and it is one of the world’s leading places where earthquakes happen spots. Four tectonic plates merge in the Kanto area of Japan, and it is one of the world’s leading earthquake spots.

There will be 70% that an's a 70% chance that if a magnitude 7 earthquake hittings directly beneath the capital, which means the magnitude 7 class earthquake happening g directly beneath the capital within decades inthen there's an earthquake happening within 10s of kilometers of the Kanto area. There's a 70% chance that if a magnitude 7 earthquake hits directly beneath the capital, then there's an earthquake happening within 10s of kilometers of the Kanto area.

not sure what you were trying to say here, hope this rewrite makes sense.

There will be 70%is a 70% chance that an earthquake hittingwill hit directly beneath the capital, which means theis would be the first magnitude 7 class earthquake happening g directly beneath the capital within decades in Kanto area. There is a 70% chance that an earthquake will hit directly beneath the capital, which means this would be the first magnitude 7 earthquake happening directly beneath the capital within decades in Kanto area.

or "There is a 70% chance of an earthquake hitting..." I am not sure what the "within decades " part, unless you mean that it has been a long time

There will be 70% that an earthquake hitting directly beneath the capital, which means they predict that there's a 70% probability a massive 7 magnitude 7 class earthquake happening gwill hit in the Kanto area directly beneath the capital within decades in Kanto areathe next few decades. They predict that there's a 70% probability a massive 7 magnitude earthquake will hit in the Kanto area directly beneath the capital within the next few decades.

"hitting directly beneath the capital" twice is redundant You can refer to experts in the field generically with "they" (they predict) and it will be understood

There will be 70%is a 70% chance that an earthquake hitting directly beneath the capital, which means the magnitude 7 class earthquake happening g, will hit directly beneath the capital of the Kanto area within decades in Kanto area. There is a 70% chance that an earthquake, which means the magnitude 7 class earthquake, will hit directly beneath the capital of the Kanto area within decades.

There will be 70% that anMY GUESS: There is a 70% chance that a major earthquake hittingwill hit directly beneath the capital, which means theithing 10 years. In other words, a magnitude 7 class earthquake is likely to happening g directly beneath the capital within a decades in Kanto area. MY GUESS: There is a 70% chance that a major earthquake will hit directly beneath the capital withing 10 years. In other words, a magnitude 7 class earthquake is likely to happen directly beneath the capital within a decade.

You cannot escape from this danger.ALSO POSSIBLE: This danger is inescapable . ALSO POSSIBLE: This danger is inescapable .

You have to knowmust expect that public support such as emergency helping,and firefighting vehicles will be paralyzed and traffic institutions will be stopped. You must expect that public support such as emergency and firefighting vehicles will be paralyzed and traffic institutions will be stopped.

You have toshould know that public support such as emergency helping, firefighting will be paralyzed and traffic institutions will be stopped. You should know that public support such as emergency helping, firefighting will be paralyzed and traffic institutions will be stopped.

"you have to" sounds like you might be expecting us to know already, while "you should know" sounds more like you are about to teach us something

You have to know that public support, such as emergency helping, firefighting will be paralyzedservices, and traffic institutions will be stopped. You have to know that public support, such as emergency services, and traffic institutions will be stopped.

You have to know that public support such as emergency helping, firefighting will be paralyzed and traffic institutions will be stoppclogged. You have to know that public support such as emergency helping, firefighting will be paralyzed and traffic institutions will be clogged.

You cannot get exact information because of thlanguage difference in languages. You cannot get exact information because of language differences.

Buildings will be broken andcrumble, broken glasses will also be spreaded, thenB big scalflames of fire will happen in many areas at the same time because of the soft tectonic plates . Buildings will crumble, broken glass will be spread, then big flames of fire will happen in many areas at the same time because of the soft tectonic plates .

Buildings will be brokencrumble and broken glasses will also be spreaded, thenBig large scales of fires will happen in many areas at the same time because of the soft tectonic plates . Buildings will crumble and broken glass will spread, then large scale fires will happen in many areas at the same time because of the soft tectonic plates .

it sounds a bit unusual to say that buildings "break" } also maybe consider changing "because of the soft tectonic plates" to something like "because of the friction caused by the nearby tectonic plates. "

Buildings will be broken, and broken glasses will also be spreaded,thenBig scales of fire will happen. Then, big flames will erupt in many areas at the same time because of the soft tectonic plates . Buildings will be broken, and broken glass will be spread. Then, big flames will erupt in many areas at the same time because of the soft tectonic plates .

Buildings will be brokenshatter and broken glasses will also be spreaded, thenBig large-scales of fires will happen in many areas at the same time because of the collision of soft tectonic plates . Buildings will be shatter and broken glasses will also spread, then large-scale fires will happen in many areas at the same time because of the collision of soft tectonic plates .

If this kind of earthquake happens, you will feel the strong wave that is classified as seismic intensity of 6~-7. If this kind of earthquake happens, you will feel the strong wave that is classified as seismic intensity of 6-7.

If this kind of earthquake happens, you will feel the strong wave that is classified by as seismic intensity of 6~7. If this kind of earthquake happens, you will feel the strong wave that is classified by a seismic intensity of 6~7.

If this kind of earthquake happens, you will feel thea strong wave that is classified as seismic intensity of 6~7. If this kind of earthquake happens, you will feel a strong wave that is classified as seismic intensity of 6~7.

IfWhen this kind of earthquake happens, you will feel thea strong wave that is classified aswith a seismic intensity of 6~7. When this kind of earthquake happens, you will feel a strong wave with a seismic intensity of 6~7.