Recently I have discovered one of myrealized a personal traits of mine. Recently I have realized a personal trait of mine.

"one of my personal traits" is ok, but this wording is a little more natural to me as it puts more focus on the one trait "discovered" is a little odd, I'd say "realized" because the trait has always been there, you just hadn't deeply thought about it yet

Recently, I have discovered one of my personal traits. Recently, I have discovered one of my personal traits.

Sometimes I feel like I have to love everyone in my life, and at the same time, I have a weird belief that Iif I love everyone in my lifedo, all their bad traits will be fixed. Sometimes I feel like I have to love everyone in my life, and at the same time, I have a weird belief that if I do, all their bad traits will be fixed.

Sometimes I feel like I have to love everyone in my life and at the same time I have a weird belief that Iif I love everyone in my life all their bad traits will be fixed. Sometimes I feel like I have to love everyone in my life and at the same time I have a weird belief that if I love everyone in my life all their bad traits will be fixed.

Sometimes I feel like I have to love everyone in my life, and at the same time I have a weird belief that Iif I love everyone in my life, all of their bad traits will be fixed. Sometimes I feel like I have to love everyone in my life, and at the same time I have a weird belief that if I love everyone in my life, all of their bad traits will be fixed.

May be better as two sentences. Second sentence starts at "at."

But is thisat really the case? But is that really the case?

Use "that" when you're talking about things that were previously said, and "this" when you're talking about the topic of the conversation.

I mean, like loving not, loving is so normal within the bounds of respect. I mean, like, loving is so normal within the bounds of respect.

just letting you know that technically the commas go there, but no one writes like this in their journals lol

I mean like loving not loving is so normal within the bounds of respect. I mean like loving not loving is so normal within the bounds of respect.

Sorry, I'm confused by "loving not loving" >_<

I mean like loving not loving is so normal within the bounds of respect. I mean like loving not loving is so normal within the bounds of respect.

Not sure what this means unfortunately

Maybe they don'tre's no need for our loved ones to be fixed, or we don't have so much responsibility to fix them. Maybe there's no need for our loved ones to be fixed, or we don't have so much responsibility to fix them.

I assume that this is what you meant? Also "it's not really our responsibility to fix them" is the way I would phrase it.

Maybe they don't need our loves to be fixed, or maybe we don't have sothat much responsibility to fix them. Maybe they don't need our love to be fixed, or maybe we don't have that much responsibility to fix them.

Maybe they don't need our loves to be fixed or maybe we don't have so muchthe responsibility to fix them. Maybe they don't need our love to be fixed or maybe we don't have the responsibility to fix them.

I hope I cmanaged to explain my thoughts clearly... I hope I managed to explain my thoughts clearly...

"managed to" is one way of putting "can" in the past tense

I hope I can explainwas able to explain (or express) my thoughts clearly... I hope I was able to explain (or express) my thoughts clearly...