2001: a Space Odyssey (containing spoiler)

A while ago I watched that famous movie, '2001: a Space Odyssey', on Netflix.

Not really a grammatical error, but I've changed to the correct official title of the movie.

I occasionally watch movies both to learn English and to talk about itin English, both to help me learn and to be able to discuss them later.

Your sentence wasn't bad, my correction removes the slight ambiguity

It was such a weird movie with too few conversationslittle dialogue, but the visuals wasere so ahead of its time, - stunning, and beautiful.

Your version wasn't completely wrong but when talking about a film like 2001, you'd be more likely to say 'dialogue' than 'conversations'. Visual should have been visuals, use the plural here

The movie wais divided into four parts, but all of themwhich are in some ways connected to a mysterious object, “mThe Monolith.”

Just a couple of style changes, also, the 'object' should be referred to as 'The Monolith' (with definite article, capitalised as a proper noun)

They fight over a pond forol of drinking water, and one group loses the fight.

It's better to say pool here, a pond is what people call what they have in their gardens (ie for fish)

ALater, after fleeing, when they sleep and tthey go to sleep for the night. When wake up, they find a huge monolith placed near them.

Just a couple of minor changes to make it sound better, the sentence was a bit too long

They don’t know who did this, but after thatw it got there. Soon after their discovery, they to learn to use tools for fightingbones as weapons and are then theyable take back the pondol.

Just making it sound clearer

TI found the second part is weird and I didn’t understand what was happening.

This sounds better, to avoid mixing tenses in one sentence

I think the second part exists towas made just to show off the visual effects ofused for the space ships.

Just a couple of minor changes in style.

SA scientistfic team has fiound thea monolith on the moon and at the end of the second part, they, just like the one from the first part of the movie. At the end of this part of the movie, the scientists hear a grinding noise coming fromthat seems to be caused by it.

Some changes to content to improve the coherence

The third part is about spaceshipthe clrews, and flawless AIthe state of the art AI, onboard a spaceship.

The people on board a ship or craft are its crew. Also changed to improve coherence. Flawless doesn't fit here to describe HAL

They are on a mission to first reach Jupiter.

The words I took out weren't necessary, and just made the sentence less strong

However, dDuring the journey, this flawless AIe AI, (known as HAL) makes a mistake for the first time.

Just stylistic, it would help the reader to know this information.

Only two awake clews (because othersof the crew are awake - this is because the rest of the crew have to hibernate to reserve resources). These two crewmembers decide to turn offshut down thise AI, but this. The AI finds out about thatis and then kills one of two awakhem along with all the clrews and all the in hibernationg clews.

Stylistic improvements (and crew corrections)

The only remainsurviving clrewmember is almost killed, but he manages to turn off the AI iis able to finally shut down the endAI.

Apart from 'clew' this was ok, just a slight style improvement.

This part isof the movie the most “catchy” part and easy to follow, and m. Most of the conversationsdialogue in thise movie are in this part.

just style / ease of reading

I guesthink it's the monolith makes the AIthat caused the AI to become faulty, andby makesing it more human-like.

Style, to be consistent with the rest of the text

The fourth part is about the remaining clrewmember, and this is the weirdest part of this movie.

ok apart from the spelling mistake

The visual is so s are very 'trippy' and psychedelic.

It's best to use 'these' for a word like trippy ('slang'). Visuals, not visual. or say 'visual effects'

It i's like a feverish dream, and thise visual effects continues for about five to ten minutes with no speech, during which time there is no dialogue.

Slight improvement to style / ease of reading

After that, the last clrewman finds himself in a closed chamber furnished with a table, bathroom, and bed.

He realizes he is looking at an old man, and the next moment, he is that old man.

I know the film, and this part is very difficult to describe, even in your own language, so well done

Then this old man finds an even older man lying on the bed, and of course this older man is also him.

Lastly, while he is lying on the bed, he findsees a monolith situated at the centere of the room.

'situated' not necessary, doesn't help the description. seeing is better, as he wasn't actively looking for anything

When he touches it, he goesseems to be back to eat Earth, and he isit appears he has been transformed into a big, bizarre looking baby inside a mysterious sphere.

Just to make the style sound consistent with the rest.

Then the movie then ends.

Just tweaked the style here.

I liked the visual effects and mysteriousness of the movie.

Changed to liked to be consistent with tense. You could also have said, you liked the look of the film, or that you liked the visuals, but 'visual effects' is more specific. Or you could have said you liked the cinematography, this would include the parts without special effects.

I think it is really hard's difficult to make such movies nowadays, because movies nowadays arethese days the industry is so much more commercialized and movie companies cannot risk themselves bytake the risk of producing such progressive movieworks.

Changed to avoid repetition

I think this movie was possible because at that time beautiful movies were rare so the visual 'look' itself had its own value.

This needs 'look' to emphasise what you're talking about here

These days, due to the technologyical advancement, we can watch any movies with a in high resolution, - so we start to take it for granted that we can watch beautiful cinemas at any time.

Style changes to make the point stronger

So if this movie were to be released now, I wouldn’t be'm not sure if it would become a hit.

Good use of subjunctive with 'were', but using the subjunctive after the comma is 'overkill', it works better as I've corrected it.

Maybe one of the reasons that the movie is so famous, is the timinge of its release.

2001 Space Odyssey (containing spoilers)

"containing spoilers" or "containing a spoiler", I think - but the plural form is much more common.

It was such a weird movie with too few conversations, but the visual was so ahead of its time, stunning, and beautiful.

"ahead of its time" is the expression. The movie belongs to a time, it was made in 1968, but it's so advanced that it seems to have come from a time ahead of its time.

The movie was divided into four parts, but all of them are in some ways connected to a mysterious object, the “monolith.”

Scientist teams find the monolith on the moon and at the end of the second part, they hear a grinding noise coming from it.

I think "they hear grinding noise" is okay, but I feel like I prefer to speak about a singular noise when using an adjective with it. I can hear noise coming from the garage. I can hear *a terrible* noise coming from the garage.

The third part is about spaceship clrews and flawless AI.

This is your biggest and most persistent mistake :) first, the word is "crew". Second, "crew" is a collective noun for people who work on a ship. A ship has crew, has a crew, you can work on a crew, be a member of a crew. The captain assigned two of the crew to watch over the saboteur. The crew were very eager to take their shore leave.

You cannot talk about an individual member of a crew as being "a crew". He is a crewmember or a crewman. "Two crews" is two separate sets of people - the ship has two crews, the maintenance crew and the operations crew. Never individuals.

OnlyThe two awake clews (becauscrewmembers who are awake (the others have to hibernate to reserve resources) decide to turn off this AI, but this AI finds out about that and then kills one of the two awake clrewmembers and all the hibernating clrews.

The onlye remaining clrewmember is almost killed, but he manages to turn off the AI in the end.

The fourth part is about the remaining clrewmember, and this is the weirdest part of this movie.

The visual iss are so trippy and psychedelic.

I guess this might be just style, but I think we universally talk about a movie's "visuals" rather than its "visual".

After that, the last clrewmember finds himself in a closed chamber furnished with a table, bathroom, and bed.

Lastly, while he is lying on the bed, he finds a monolith situated attanding in the center of the room.

"situated" isn't incorrect here, but it often feels a bit awkward to me and I'd much prefer to just say the monolith is standing there.

When he touches it, he goes back to earth and he is a big, bizarre looking baby inside a mysterious sphere.

He has to touch something.

I like the visuals and mysteriousness of the movie.

I think this movie was possible because at that time beautiful movies were rare so the visual itself had itss themselves had their own value.

These days, due to the technology advancement of technology, we can watch any movies with a high resolution, so we start to take it for granted that we can watch beautiful cinemasbeautiful cinematography for granted.

Changing this a little, don't know if it's exactly what you mean. We would never say "watch beautiful cinemas" - a cinema is a movie theatre, and that sounds like you're standing outside the movie theatre appreciating the building's architecture.