Oct. 1, 2025
01.10.2025
Yesterday I read an article on the site https://www.bbc.com/travel. The article was simpler, and I think that I understand very well. The article describes a small town close to Amsterdam named Zaanse Schans. Zaanse Schans is very famous for its windmills. In this place, there is more tourism, but in a small place, which could be a problem because all the services of Zaanse Schans aren't sufficient for all the tourists. This is awful, because the Zaanse Schans loses more money. If you wander up into Zaanse Schans, you can meet more tourists from England, Italy, France, and Germany. If you decide to go to Zaanse Schans you remember to wear a windproof jacket. In this place, the weather is very threatening.
01.10.2025
Yesterday I read an article on the site https://www.bbc.com/travel.
The article was simpler, and I think that I understandood it very well.
The article describes a small town close to Amsterdam named Zaanse Schans.
Zaanse Schans is very famous for its windmills.
In this place, there is morea lot of tourism, but int is a small place, which could be a problem because all the services of Zaanse Schans aren't sufficient for all the tourists.
This is awful, because the Zaanse Schans loses morea lot money.
If you wander up into Zaanse Schans, you can meet more tourists from England, Italy, France, and Germany.
If you decide to go to Zaanse Schans you must remember to wear a windproof jacket.
You should use must, need to, or should before what you do.
In this place, the weather is very threatening.
Feedback
Great job! You use 'more' where you should be using 'a lot's or 'many'. More is used when comparing two things. "There are more tourists in Paris then England". And "many" or "a lot" when describing. "There are many tourists in Paris". "There are a lot of buildings in England" etc.
The article was simpler (than…), and I think that I understand it very well.
“The article was simpler” sounds strange on its own without identifying what it’s being compared to.
In this place, there is more tourism, but int is a small place, which could be a problem because all the services of Zaanse Schans aren't sufficient for all the tourists.
This is awful, because the Zaanse Schans loses more money.
If you decide to go to Zaanse Schans you should remember to wear a windproof jacket.
|
01.10.2025 This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Yesterday I read an article on the site https://www.bbc.com/travel. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
The article was simpler, and I think that I understand very well. The article was simpler (than…), and I think that I understand it very well. “The article was simpler” sounds strange on its own without identifying what it’s being compared to. The article was simple |
|
The article describes a small town close to Amsterdam named Zaanse Schans. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
Zaanse Schans is very famous for its windmills. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
If you wander up into Zaanse Schans, you can meet more tourists from England, Italy, France, and Germany. If you wander up into Zaanse Schans, you can meet |
|
If you decide to go to Zaanse Schans you remember to wear a windproof jacket. If you decide to go to Zaanse Schans you should remember to wear a windproof jacket. If you decide to go to Zaanse Schans you must remember to wear a windproof jacket. You should use must, need to, or should before what you do. |
|
In this place, the weather is very threatening. This sentence has been marked as perfect! |
|
In this place, there is more tourism, but in a small place, which could be a problem because all the services of Zaanse Schans aren't sufficient for all the tourists. In this place, there is more tourism, but i In this place, there is |
|
This is awful, because the Zaanse Schans loses more money. This is awful This is awful, because |
You need LangCorrect Premium to access this feature.
Go Premium